mr-monte-hall wrote:I'll keep this as short as I can so that it might get read.About two years ago I'd screwed up several auctions of a member of the Acaeum community because I had a problem with his buying and selling methods.It wasn't the first time. bclarkie correctly surmised I'd been responsible for several similar attacks in previous years. All the attacks attributed to "vecnapoop" were solely my doing.Say what you will about my attitude or my actions. What I regret most is not having the balls to fess up and take accountability for my actions but rather to cower in a corner and blurt stupid excuses and lies like some indignant retard. I think a person can atone for actions, but not for lying about them or covering them up.bclarkie also correctly identified my alias of greyhawk-fan and the trouble I'd caused for this site with that userid. That was just stupid and there is no excuse for it. I was angry for my own behavior, and it was misdirected at the members of this site.For anyone who actually believed anything I'd said since that time, I apologize. I apologize to any posters I'd attacked since then, and to the administrator of this site. I apologize to anyone who had nothing to do with any of this but had to sift through the circus I'd contributed to.I wanted to set the record straight. It may be that no one remembers or that no one cares. It makes me sick that I never admitted to it. I don't have anything to add to that.
As an aside, I think its interesting bclarkie (where is he now) nailed it AGAIN, so those he has called out in the past who denied wrong doings should be mindful.
Tharizdun wrote:Or, everyone else should be mindful about the people he has called out
Badmike wrote:Im going to go into speculation and assume you have had an event in your life, or entered some sort of therapy, rehab, etc that requires you to "confront" people you have harmed in the past and make amends, and this is you way to make good on this. If so good luck to you I hope it works out. However the absolute level of planning in your attacks frankly weirds be out, and I'll never trust you again no matter what. What anyone else thinks of you I don't know but I wouldn't bet on being "buds" here with anyone even with your confession.
JohnGaunt wrote:Continuing the speculation . . .Remember that you are apologizing to put your past behind you. Our acceptance or rejection of said apology is not the issue.Now make the apology more than lip service by not effing doing it again. And don't forget the financial amends that are forthcoming to those that you wronged --- sellers like BadMike? Foul for having to deal with your shit?
mr-monte-hall wrote:To John and Mike. I didn't intend a second post but in trying to be brief I was way too vague.The explanation of my actions is also a promise for whatever it's worth that the attack on Mike's auctions in February 2008 was and will be the last attack on him or anyone at the Acaeum. I used "attack" elsewhere in my post where I only meant nasty spars on this forum or stupid tattling with the greyhawk-fan ebay userid.You probably think there's some kind of twelve steps happening here. There isn't. I'm not interested in forgiveness. I'm interested in doing the best I can to correct a major character flaw of mine. So as you said John, your rejection or acceptance of what I have to say is not the issue.Inparticular Mike, I'd lose respect for you if you forgave me. At least I would if you did it before we'd settled our differences outside a half price books somewhere in Texas. We'll never see eye to eye or be "best buds" as you say. I think we can both live with that.I don't mean it to sound harsh or rude but I've already accomplished what I set out to do with my first post. I tried to set the record straight. If there are still questions I'll try to answer whatever else you like but I would prefer to avoid disrupting your forum further.
RaisedFromTheDead wrote:Probably want to exclude Hitler, Pol Pot, Idi Amin and some others.
RaisedFromTheDead wrote:Geek, keep in mind that Monte is doing this for personal benefit, not, as he himself stated, to right any past wrongs, but to change a character flaw.