pepsigalore in Q&A on the auction with emphasis from grodog wrote:Q: Better pictures please? What printing? Photos of the box both top and bottom with condition descriptions. What is the name written on the cover... Are there names, marks in books, box, and/or rusty staples, etc. Jun-02-09A: 1874 second edition. Box shows wear, but all there. My name. No, no, no, & no.
grodog wrote:The way I'm reading this, that's my linchpin, since his response of no marks in books, no marks in box, no rusty staples, no "etc." is what lead me to believe that the set was well-worn, but in good shape on the inside.Am I off-base here? Any and all opinions and guidance are sought, since I haven't had to deal with an eBay dispute before, much less a $1500 one. Thanks!
grodog wrote:Hi guys---I'm the sucker who bought ** expired/removed eBay auction **It turns out the that the rules and supplements are well-annotated in pencil and pen, in particular the first GH, but also including the reference sheets, all of the core three rulebooks, and Chainmail. BM's actually clean, except for the page 46 dungeon map colored in with magic marker. GD&H is in excellent condition, except for the water damage warping present on the cover that smears the owner's name on the cover sheet and continues through basically to the end of the book (though getting smaller as you proceed through the book). I've been trying to work out an amicable return with the seller, given that he clearly didn't describe the books accurately in the Q&A, but he's not willing to do that, he decided tonight. So, I'll take it to eBay/Paypal/my credit card.What's my best approach to try to get a full refund on this set? The seller maintains that because he said the box was only in "good" condition (nearly all of the corners are blown and held together with tape), and that the books were "used" that it doesn't matter that his descriptions were inaccurate. More specifically that:The way I'm reading this, that's my linchpin, since his response of no marks in books, no marks in box, no rusty staples, no "etc." is what lead me to believe that the set was well-worn, but in good shape on the inside.Am I off-base here? Any and all opinions and guidance are sought, since I haven't had to deal with an eBay dispute before, much less a $1500 one. Thanks!
Grug Greyskin wrote:Make sure all communication to the seller is done through the official E-Bay system, not via regular email.Open a dispute via PayPal for SNAD, you have 45 days from the date of sale to do that. I think with those questions, you have pretty strong standing.ARRRGH - as I write this I get an outbid notice on that recently posted Bloodstone lot - Dammit!
grodog wrote:What's my best approach to try to get a full refund on this set? The seller maintains that because he said the box was only in "good" condition (nearly all of the corners are blown and held together with tape), and that the books were "used" that it doesn't matter that his descriptions were inaccurate.