The Acaeum Dungeons & Dragons
Collecting Forums

Problems with searching in ebay
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 1 of 21, 2
Author

User avatar

Long-Winded Collector
JG Valuation Board

Posts: 3823
Joined: Jul 12, 2007
Last Visit: Dec 17, 2021

Post Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:59 pm 
 

Anyone having problems with the searches in ebay today? I noticed one of my listings didn't appear, tried again then some items appeared and others didn't. It seems like the search function is screwer up.

  


Prolific Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 580
Joined: Mar 17, 2009
Last Visit: Dec 11, 2022
Location: Indiana, USA

Post Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:08 pm 
 

Is it possible that they are finishing the changeover to the "new" look and feel?  I have one computer that has been showing the new page layout for almost a month and my notebook is just catching up.  I'll be glad when they're done screwing around with the code and things settle down.


Image

 WWW  

User avatar

Sage Collector

Posts: 2736
Joined: May 31, 2007
Last Visit: Jul 09, 2026

Post Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:32 pm 
 

The new look is already mandated, for US customers anyway. It is the most horrible thing I have ever witnessed.


Those who can, don't. Those who should not, do.

  

User avatar

Long-Winded Collector
JG Valuation Board

Posts: 3823
Joined: Jul 12, 2007
Last Visit: Dec 17, 2021

Post Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:41 pm 
 

serleran wrote:The new look is already mandated, for US customers anyway. It is the most horrible thing I have ever witnessed.


Where do they get these page designs? Whose freaking cousin is being paid to do this work. It pisses me off but there is 0 to be done about it.

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 8283
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Last Visit: Jun 26, 2025
Location: Wallasey, Merseyside, UK

Post Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:52 pm 
 

JasonZavoda wrote:
Where do they get these page designs? Whose freaking cousin is being paid to do this work. It pisses me off but there is 0 to be done about it.


i agree. i took about 3 months off ebay and now i am struggling to find anything - its just stupid


Are we nearly there yet?

  

User avatar

Long-Winded Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 3718
Joined: May 30, 2007
Last Visit: Aug 04, 2026
Location: USA Georgia

Post Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:57 pm 
 

serleran wrote:The new look is already mandated, for US customers anyway. It is the most horrible thing I have ever witnessed.


They are investing in smoke and mirrors instead of customer service.    At least they'll have something "pretty" to show at the next stockholder meeting.  :roll:


Truth is worth finding and life is too short to work for money.

  


Active Collector

Posts: 54
Joined: Feb 05, 2007
Last Visit: Oct 06, 2013
Location: Huntsville, AL

Post Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 10:13 pm 
 

JasonZavoda wrote:
Where do they get these page designs? Whose freaking cousin is being paid to do this work. It pisses me off but there is 0 to be done about it.


A while back, when they were making the first of the current round of needless, seemingly random, changes to their site, I responded to a request for comments on the new design. I took the time to put together what I thought were a fairly well-considered set of comments. I didn't even get an automated reply. And, of course, none of my input was acted upon.  :roll:

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 7050
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Last Visit: Jul 24, 2026
Location: UK

Post Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 2:48 am 
 

Searches filter out a lot of stuff and won't display it.Searching by keyword now is irrelevant because items won't be displayed even when that keyword is in the title, if the seller or the item does not have a high enough priority. The reason for this is twofold, and it serves eBay well. Firstly, sellers will need to pay more for priority listing in searches and keep their noses clean to keep regular placement in searches, and secondly, it forces sellers away from regular auction listings where they are likely to get fewer people finding and bidding on their stuff and therefore experience lower prices, and into buying a shop where they have to pay a maintenance fee and eBay earns more.

So all round, it is a good move for eBay who win again. A bad move for non-shop owners who will see a gradual fall off in prices, and a pain for shop owners who will have to wait longer for their stuff to sell as it takes longer for people to find the goods.

The people who lose out this time round is the buyer, as their experience is compromised, but then eBay makes no money out of the buyer whatsoever. It's not like they can go anywhere else.


This week I've been mostly eating . . . The white ones with the little red flecks in them.

 WWW  

User avatar

Sage Collector

Posts: 2736
Joined: May 31, 2007
Last Visit: Jul 09, 2026

Post Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 11:00 am 
 

but then eBay makes no money out of the buyer whatsoever.


That is not true. Via PayPal, they make lots of money off buyers, through final purchase fees. Without buyers to drive up the prices they get from sellers, they make nothing, except from sellers listing -- but, if no one is there to buy it, sellers stop listing, and eBay makes, literally, nothing at all. I don't know if they charge a percentage on listing based on final sale (I think they do not) but without buyers, eBay has no market:

In a consumer-driven environment which eBay facilitates, it is incumbent on the seller / retailer to make people want to buy their product as opposed to somewhere else -- if I can't find what I'm looking for, I might assume they don't have it and not return, even for future possible sales, because, after all, if they don't have this, why would they have something else? It's only when it is "mandatory" (like a grocery store) that I'll return -- eBay is lucky in one thing: there really aren't other places like it, and its "goods" change daily... but, they need to be obtainable or it doesn't matter if you're selling something someone wants. If demand doesn't know you have a supply... supply is irrelevant, to be blunt.

But, maybe I'm oversimplifying?


Those who can, don't. Those who should not, do.

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 7050
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Last Visit: Jul 24, 2026
Location: UK

Post Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:34 pm 
 

No. Other than the fact that the buyer is present during the transaction, eBay makes all it's money off of the seller. The buyer contributes nothing to eBay whatsoever. And in most instances, people buy on eBay because they cannot buy cheaper or easier elsewhere, so there is no need to pander to buyers at all.

If you say eBay has no market without buyers, the same is true for sellers. Buy their entire funding comes from sellers only. So that pount is eronious.

As regards all the other points, whether a buyer can find what they are looking for or not, they have no choice. eBay has an absolute monopoly over the entire market. Furthermore, buyers have been pushing eBay to bias their policies in favour of the buyer for the past five years. If there is a change that in some ways inconveniences buyers, then maybe it's about time. As with all other changes, this will do very little to damage eBay as a company. It may be a welcome change to an otherwise dull experience.


This week I've been mostly eating . . . The white ones with the little red flecks in them.

 WWW  


Prolific Collector

Posts: 153
Joined: May 28, 2006
Last Visit: Jul 15, 2021

Post Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:25 pm 
 

I am pretty sure the last time this topic came up, all that could be agreed upon is that cake is good.   PDT_Armataz_01_03



That being said, the buyer is the one funding ebay.  The seller pays a small listing fee and that is it.  The buyer pays the seller and ebay and paypal.  Oversimplified example, think of an item that sells for $20.  $1 goes to Paypal, $2 goes to Ebay and $17 goes to the seller.  The seller never made $20.  They made $17.  And nothing came out of the seller's pocket at the end of the auction.



Think of the real estate market (at least in the US).  A seller puts up a house for $100,000 and hires an agent to promote it.  A buyer also has an agent.  At the time of sale, the buyer drops 100K.  The seller gets $94,000, seller's agent gets $3,000 and buyer's agent gets $3,000.  The seller made $94,000 from the $100,000 listing.  He didn't have to cough up $3,000 to have the agent assist him if the house didn't sell so he was out $0.  If he wanted to make more than $94,000, he would have increased the ask price and not settled for less.  Same thing with Ebay.  

(Original home owner = Ebay Seller.  Home buyer = Ebay Buyer.  Seller's Agent = Ebay.  Buyer's Agent = Paypal)



Final sales price doesn't represent what seller made.  Without the buyer, ebay makes a few cents on listing fees.  Not until the buyer sends money does the pie start getting divided.

  

User avatar

Prolific Collector

Posts: 415
Joined: Jun 13, 2008
Last Visit: Jun 04, 2026

Post Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:45 pm 
 

I think Ian's point is that without sellers, there is no product to sell, and thus no money to be exchanged and no money for eBay & PayPal to take a cut of.

The seller is absolutely critical to the process of eBay making money, whereas eBay can (and does) make money without buyers.


Guy Fullerton
Chaotic Henchmen Productions
http://www.chaotichenchmen.com/

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 7050
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Last Visit: Jul 24, 2026
Location: UK

Post Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 3:00 pm 
 

I've been keeping fairly accurate records for the past two rears.
eBay take a straight 22% between listing fees, final valuation fees, monthly shop rental and PayPal fees.

That 22% comes straight out of profit and it isn't something that is 'passed on' to the buyer.

Sellers are also not allowed to defend themselves against feedback extortion, and eBay are allowed to make adhoc judgements on the buyer's behalf without evidence and remove funds from the seller without ever requiring the buyer to return goods, and regardless of any PayPal decision to the contrary.

Until eBay decide to level the playing feild and require all members to provide validated proof of age, address and intelligence level, there will always be a bias in the system.

I just think that if a buyer can't find something and can't be bothered putting in a little extra time to hunt for what is really worth buying, then all the more bargains for those of us who can.


This week I've been mostly eating . . . The white ones with the little red flecks in them.

 WWW  

User avatar

Sage Collector

Posts: 2736
Joined: May 31, 2007
Last Visit: Jul 09, 2026

Post Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 3:03 pm 
 

There is a difference between not being able to find something due to user error or ignorance, and that of being unable to find it because the system used for the searching does not allow you to find something.


Those who can, don't. Those who should not, do.

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 7050
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Last Visit: Jul 24, 2026
Location: UK

Post Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 3:12 pm 
 

The system used for searching now filters product based on the quality of the seller experience (as reported by other buyers), the qualtity of revenue generated by the seller, and the previous results those keywords have returned that have resulted in searchers watching or bidding upon. The bigger the seller you are, the more often your product will appear in search results, and small time sellers will still feature, but will be either be placed farther down the list (say page 7) or filtered out as not likely to generate revenue.


This week I've been mostly eating . . . The white ones with the little red flecks in them.

 WWW  

User avatar

Sage Collector

Posts: 2589
Joined: Aug 02, 2006
Last Visit: Mar 11, 2023
Location: Seattle, WA

Post Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:24 pm 
 

Would choosing something other than "Best Match" for the search results remove this issue?

Choosing "Time: Newly Listed" would seem to remove any prioritization other than a date stamp.

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 7050
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Last Visit: Jul 24, 2026
Location: UK

Post Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:40 pm 
 

For best results, I have found that you can run the filtered search with prioritisation, and then reorder the findings by date after the search results are in. That way you pick up all the flagged search items and most of the unprioritized matches also, and when you hit the date order, you get them into order of importance (ending soonest) and not according to how eBay thinks you're gonna want to buy them.

Unfortunately, if you change the priority before you do the run the search, you'll lose a chunk of both the flagged items and the general unflagged items also, as the old style keyword search filter is f"cked and only searches keywords prelisted by eBay's screening filters and not the original title and description database.

At least that's what I've been able to glean from UK seller telephone support (none of which are overly technically literate and some of which seem to not even be actually literate). Maybe I just happen to phone when they have their care in the community days.


This week I've been mostly eating . . . The white ones with the little red flecks in them.

 WWW  

User avatar

Sage Collector

Posts: 2736
Joined: May 31, 2007
Last Visit: Jul 09, 2026

Post Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:46 pm 
 

I don't really bother with searches, to be honest. I typically do "ending within an hour" or "started within 12 hours and is BIN." Everything else is just junk on there, and never works right.


Those who can, don't. Those who should not, do.

  
Next
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 1 of 21, 2