misterspock wrote in Interesting Items Currently on eBay:someone bought 13 from him on this one auction .. was that when he said he "had 13 left"?eBay.com Item Purchase History the new auction...eBay.com Item Purchase History
Blackmoor wrote in Interesting Items Currently on eBay:misterspock wrote in Interesting Items Currently on eBay:someone bought 13 from him on this one auction .. was that when he said he "had 13 left"?eBay.com Item Purchase History the new auction...eBay.com Item Purchase History Well that's a lot of buckles, I think I will wait on that one for sure (like forever )
dbartman wrote in Interesting Items Currently on eBay:A case could be made that this seller is being deceptive, and is actually either making these belt buckles, or having someone produce them for him. I say this having bought a couple of them. They look really good, but there are some subtle differences between the ones I purchased, and ones that I seen with some age on them, including the ones he has pictured. I'm beginning to think that these could be forgeries.The biggest visual difference I noticed, other than how "new" they are, is in the wire diameter used for the loop. The originals all seem to have a larger wire diameter, at least the ones I have been exposed to.I think the seller needs to be confronted on this. Bergamot Brass Casting is definitely a good source to contact, but it could be some Chinese company too.
muaddib5 wrote in Interesting Items Currently on eBay:I asked the seller if the buckles were actually "new old stock" and this is his reply, "Yes these buckles are from 1980. We have collected them for years."If these buckles are as rare as we believe, even collecting for years, how do you get over 50 of them!!!
JasonZavoda wrote in Interesting Items Currently on eBay: ** expired/removed eBay auction **
cdenham wrote in Interesting Items Currently on eBay:Posted this into the wrong group initially....
cdenham wrote in Interesting Items Currently on eBay:cdenham wrote in Interesting Items Currently on eBay:Posted this into the wrong group initially....Hmmm... that didn't take long. I wonder if he had it listed incorrectly? I thought it was a good deal.