By the way, the link from the new page is broken to see these, so I found it doing a google search. Seems like lots of the links are broken since the site was updated.
Philflound wrote in CGC Grading Etc...:Just wanted to give a quick update. We've been getting quite a few submissions both open and sealed items. I just want to clarify a few things for those who wish to send items to CGC.1. Items must be bound in some way. What I mean with this is that either glued or stapled. There are some products that have pages completely separated with hole punches for binders. We will grade these items if still in shrinkwrap, but if opened, they will be rejected and returned.2. Shrinkwap must be intact to be graded sealed. Torn and split shrinkwrap is fine as long as the contents cannot be compromised. The item cannot be removable from the shrinkwrap. We got a few of these recently, one of which had the shrinkwrap put on backwards. As long as the contents cannot be totally removed from the shrinkwrap, then that is fine.3. Just want to touch on this, though we haven't gotten any of these submitted. We do not grade hardcover books. This also goes for comic books and other magazines. I don't exactly know the decision behind this, but I think it has something to do with the holder.4. We do not grade print on demand RPG items. We have gotten submissions where someone had autographs on PODs and we had to send them back. 5. We will grade any other RPGs. I've been waiting to see other items. We've mostly gotten TSR items along with some DC RPG pieces, but not much else. I've been waiting to see some of the I.C.E. items from Middle Earth among other things since I do own a few pieces from this series. Though my personal copies were played.6. I attempt to give art credits when possible. With magazines, we only have a total of 4 lines where we can add art and key comments. So we always put the writer, written as "Gary Gygax text" for example. We also try to give the cover artist. Interior artists are added if there is room. 7. If you see any mistakes on a label, please contact me. Typos occur occasionally, but we usually have 3 sets of eyes on each item. Many of the early releases didn't give credits, but research on Wiki and other sites sometimes gives me the info I need.8. If you want to submit something but are unsure, contact me and let me know what the item is and I'll discuss it with management to see if we can grade them. Thanks and happy collecting.Phil
cstojano wrote in CGC Grading Etc...:For those collecting graded in shrink items, do you feel we have enough public auction data yet to determine whether CGC items carry a premium? My sense based on a small sample of Dragonlance modules is that the answer is yes. Is this also the case with comics? I had heard that CBCS grades were tougher than CGC, but that doesn't seem to be the case here. Best example I have is May 22nd Heritage auction where a DL 10 sold for both CGC 9.6 and CBCS 9.6 and the CGC was nearly double.
Badmike wrote in CGC Grading Etc...:They do, but it's not a ton. I would only get stuff slabbed you are interested in preserving, or for display. Betting on the price rising to crazy levels will not pay off, IMO.Mike B.
cstojano wrote in CGC Grading Etc...:Hello, sorry I wasn't clear in my post. I was asking about the value of CGC vs CBCS for the same grades. The few public auction sales seem to show CGC carries a higher premium even though I understood CBCS were stricter graders.Also to confirm this is mostly for display and preservation not investment.
Tszii wrote in CGC Grading Etc...:That is a good snag. Its like $35 to grade. I dont know about normalizing. The amount of copies of everything is as high as I have ever seen. Prices seem to stay level or up overall. The dragon #1 looks great. Its one of my regrets.
stratochamp wrote in CGC Grading Etc...:I just looked at the Dragon #1. There are stains on the back cover, rubbing all down the back right side and a noticeable rounding all down the spine (I wonder if it was in a binder for a long time). I'm just stunned this received an 8.0, which is supposed to be very fine. That magazine is NOT in very fine condition. I really do wonder what circus monkeys decide on these grades. It is possible this is how they have been taught to grade these and they would grade any copy that looked like this with that same grade. In which case I would suggest the meaning of the words "Very Fine" eludes them. I do further realize that I am likely an old man shaking my fist at the clouds; on the other hand my best copies of all of these super rare items are in a lot better shape than this 8.0.