Philflound wrote in CGC Grading Etc...:Actually with that submission of the R1, R3 & R4, the submitter had a reshrinked item that we rejected. Not sure if he knew or not when sending it in. I look forward to many more submissions. I had my own original 7 graded items of the small books, with the 8th one (Eldritch) about to be submitted this week. We have never graded any of the 5 Supplements, so I had to build these from scratch. In the video (which I'm still waiting to be released) I mistakenly call the supplements expansions. My section is a whole 3 1/2 - 4 minutes but we took an hour to film just me. Talk about retakes. I'm no professional. :D I'll post a link to it whenever they make it live. So far we haven't been getting any non-D&D items. I'm tempted to submit my Middle Earth items. Also, if I ever find my Witch Hunt RPG boxed set, I may submit that rulebook. That piece is rather rare. I am also trying to get as much info on Dragon issues in our key comments and art credits. There were some errors with publisher too as they changed throughout the years. So you'll be seeing more info on the labels. If the company ever upgrades the program we use (been years in the making) hopefully we'll get more space for credits. Magazines only get 4 total lines whereas comics get 6.Phil
cstojano wrote in CGC Grading Etc...:Phil, one of your comments above mentioned the box sets. Surely you don't mean the expert and basic boxed sets that actually have some width to the box do you? Currently I am using AFA to grade those as "toys".
cstojano wrote in CGC Grading Etc...:Would be interested in hearing numbers on faked shrink since it seems to come up often as a con against collecting sealed items (easily faked).
Philflound wrote in CGC Grading Etc...:The thing with all these graded modules is putting "highest graded" is not as impressive as people may think. That B1 is the ONLY graded 4th printing out there, so of course it is the highest. I'm technically going to have the highest graded original 3 rulebooks of 4th printing because they are going to be the ONLY 4th printing to be graded. I had to build them before submitting. Thing is, the original boxed sets, we have not graded any 1st - 3rd printings. So if you want to bethe first, send them in.Now may be the time to send this stuff in and sell it. You may realize the most for your modules. Is it taking advantage? Probably. But I'd rather see collectors make money, maybe to even buy more stuff for their collection.Phil
cstojano wrote in CGC Grading Etc...:Phil, this is the comment I was responding to about the boxed sets thing. Maybe you are referring to the books from those sets not the sealed sets themselves.
Philflound wrote in CGC Grading Etc...:Point out exactly where you read the shrinkwrap is removed? Was it on here? It certainly was not by me.
Tszii wrote in CGC Grading Etc...:Even folks who dont like grading could appreciate this a little right? :) I am not talking about price, just the display piece. I love it. ** expired/removed eBay auction **
cstojano wrote in CGC Grading Etc...:Hard to tell if the case is signed or the module. If the module then a shame it isn't a CGC yellow label. I hope one day someone organizes a signing for Elmore, Easley, Dee, Otus for CGC yellow label certification.
red_bus wrote in CGC Grading Etc...:(squinting) ... has he signed the plastic case! :lol: