lawrenson wrote:Hi,has this board turned into Dragonsfoot?
Badmike wrote:or fave Hannah Montana songs.....Mike B.
jasonw1239 wrote:Cue the: "I am being wronged, it did not happen like that but I am honorable and cannot disclose the details..." defense...
Gus Landt wrote:If those auctions were set up as immediate payment required, then Spock did not win them. Simply clicking the 'buy it' buttons in no way made him the winner. If that is the case, then Pipswich was free & clear to have bought them.
jasonw1239 wrote:That dragon cake is simply amazing!
ashmire13 wrote:As I see it, the items were sold to misterspock on the basis that he committed to buying three items.
Gus Landt wrote:But that simply isn't how 'Immediate Payment Required' auctions work. Until the item is paid for, they are still live auctions and anyone else can come along and buy them. Pip wouldn't have had any idea that someone came along and clicked the buy it now button but never paid. Ebay still had the auction running because no one had paid. That is how 'Immediate Payment Required' auctions work. It wasn't a case of the seller simply saying "Immediate Payment Required" in the item description. 'Immediate Payment Required' is a specific option to auction listings, and means NO SALE is made until payment is finished.
Kingofpain89 wrote:I'd rather wear a steak suit around a group of starving pit bulls than do business with Pip.
ashmire13 wrote:misterspock makes no mention of them being immediate payment. From the evidence he shows, they were BIN with the 'request total from seller' link available.Whats the point of having an immediate payment necessary, if you have to request a total from the seller. You can't pay until you get that. On that basis, a sale could go to multiple buyers.
ashmire13 wrote:previous information shown on other threads has shown dubious transactions taking place in the past by pip and this, for me, is a final nail.
Grug Greyskin wrote:Whether it was an immediate payment auction or not looks to be the critical diputed fact in this conflict.
gyg wrote: And add that to the fact that there is a thread here called "MrSpock is the man of the year" or some similar title then I think you can make a judgement call at least on the personalities of the individuals concerned.